GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Why is RTX 4000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 4060?
The battle between the professional RTX 4000 Ada Generation and the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reveals the divide between uncompromised industrial efficiency and modern gaming value. The RTX 4000 Ada Generally holds a lead in raw rendering benchmarks, representing a powerhouse that masters uncompromised professional visualization and scientific computing with world-class scale.
Technically, the RTX 4000 Ada wins on absolute architectural muscle with its massive 20GB of VRAM—more than the 16GB found on the enthusiast card—along with certified drivers and a staggeringly efficient 130W power envelope. While the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a robust engine for high-end gaming and creative tasks, it lacks the overall memory depth and industrial throughput found on the professional Ada Lovelace chip. Moving to an industrial Ada engine is a transformative upgrade for professionals seeking uncompromised resolution in 2026.
The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the undisputed winner in absolute rendering performance and uncompromised industrial efficiency. it represents a world-class tool for professional high-end projects. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB remains the winner for modern activists and enthusiasts who priority the best price-to-performance ratio for legendary 1440p gaming on a stationary rig. for any rig requiring uncompromised memory scale and industrial muscle, the 20GB workstation card is the clear and superior winner.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 23% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 4060 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-23%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+23%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $1,547 for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation, it costs 81% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 320.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+320.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($299) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,547) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 23%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 96 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 24,046+23% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 6144+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+77% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+58% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 192+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 48 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 48+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 192+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 32.4% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 360 GB/s+32% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 48 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 70W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-27% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 343.5+102% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999 and now averages $1547. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 80.7% less ($1248 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 15.5 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 321.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-85% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299-81% | $1547 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+322% | 15.5 |
| Codename | AD107 | AD104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #84 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation
