HD Graphics P530 vs Quadro 4000M

HD Graphics P530

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

2011Core: 475 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

HD Graphics P530

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics P530: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics P530 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is HD Graphics P530 better than Quadro 4000M?
Yes. HD Graphics P530 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 1,310 vs 1,287 in G3D Mark. On top of that, HD Graphics P530 is a 2015 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro 4000M is a 2011 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 4000M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 2 GB instead of Unknown. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
HD Graphics P530 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. HD Graphics P530 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. HD Graphics P530 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.8% higher G3D Mark. Quadro 4000M is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Quadro 4000M make more sense than HD Graphics P530?
Yes. Quadro 4000M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of HD Graphics P530. The trade-off is that HD Graphics P530 currently gives you 1.8% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetHD Graphics P530Quadro 4000M
1080p
low15 FPS51 FPS
medium11 FPS41 FPS
high6 FPS25 FPS
ultra4 FPS15 FPS
1440p
low10 FPS28 FPS
medium6 FPS21 FPS
high3 FPS12 FPS
ultra1 FPS7 FPS
4K
low4 FPS11 FPS
medium2 FPS9 FPS
high1 FPS5 FPS
ultra1 FPS5 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetHD Graphics P530Quadro 4000M
1080p
low59 FPS58 FPS
medium47 FPS46 FPS
high33 FPS39 FPS
ultra23 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low44 FPS43 FPS
medium26 FPS30 FPS
high19 FPS20 FPS
ultra14 FPS16 FPS
4K
low23 FPS18 FPS
medium14 FPS12 FPS
high11 FPS9 FPS
ultra8 FPS6 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetHD Graphics P530Quadro 4000M
1080p
low59 FPS58 FPS
medium47 FPS46 FPS
high39 FPS39 FPS
ultra29 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low44 FPS43 FPS
medium35 FPS35 FPS
high29 FPS29 FPS
ultra22 FPS22 FPS
4K
low29 FPS29 FPS
medium24 FPS23 FPS
high20 FPS19 FPS
ultra15 FPS14 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetHD Graphics P530Quadro 4000M
1080p
low59 FPS58 FPS
medium47 FPS46 FPS
high27 FPS39 FPS
ultra19 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low9 FPS15 FPS
medium7 FPS13 FPS
high5 FPS11 FPS
ultra4 FPS9 FPS
4K
low6 FPS11 FPS
medium4 FPS8 FPS
high3 FPS7 FPS
ultra2 FPS5 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics P530 and Quadro 4000M

Intel

HD Graphics P530

The HD Graphics P530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,310 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics P530 scores 1,310 and the Quadro 4000M reaches 1,287 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics P530 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Quadro 4000M uses Fermi, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics P530) vs 336 (Quadro 4000M). Raw compute: 0.4416 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P530) vs 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M).

FeatureHD Graphics P530Quadro 4000M
G3D Mark Score
1,310+2%
1,287
Architecture
Generation 9.0
Fermi
Process Node
14 nm+
40 nm
Shading Units
192
336+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4416 TFLOPS
0.6384 TFLOPS+45%
ROPs
3
32+967%
TMUs
16
56+250%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics P530Quadro 4000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics P530 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000M has 2 GB. The Quadro 4000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureHD Graphics P530Quadro 4000M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics P530 draws 15W versus the Quadro 4000M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The HD Graphics P530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics P530) vs 350W (Quadro 4000M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureHD Graphics P530Quadro 4000M
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
87.3+577%
12.9
💰

Value Analysis

The HD Graphics P530 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureHD Graphics P530Quadro 4000M
MSRP
$0
Codename
Skylake GT2
GF104
Release
September 1 2015
February 22 2011
Ranking
#859
#801