
HD Graphics P530
Popular choices:

Quadro 4000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
HD Graphics P530
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quadro 4000M
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics P530: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics P530 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
HD Graphics P530
2015Quadro 4000M
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics P530: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics P530 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is HD Graphics P530 better than Quadro 4000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro 4000M make more sense than HD Graphics P530?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | HD Graphics P530 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | HD Graphics P530 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | HD Graphics P530 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | HD Graphics P530 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 5 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics P530 and Quadro 4000M

HD Graphics P530
HD Graphics P530
The HD Graphics P530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,310 points.

Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics P530 scores 1,310 and the Quadro 4000M reaches 1,287 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics P530 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Quadro 4000M uses Fermi, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics P530) vs 336 (Quadro 4000M). Raw compute: 0.4416 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P530) vs 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M).
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,310+2% | 1,287 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 336+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4416 TFLOPS | 0.6384 TFLOPS+45% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 16 | 56+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics P530 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000M has 2 GB. The Quadro 4000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics P530 draws 15W versus the Quadro 4000M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The HD Graphics P530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics P530) vs 350W (Quadro 4000M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 87.3+577% | 12.9 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics P530 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | Skylake GT2 | GF104 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | February 22 2011 |
| Ranking | #859 | #801 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













