HD Graphics P530 vs Tesla M2070-Q
HD Graphics P530
Popular choices:
Tesla M2070-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The HD Graphics P530 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla M2070-Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | HD Graphics P530 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the HD Graphics P530 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics P530 and Tesla M2070-Q
HD Graphics P530
The HD Graphics P530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,310 points.
Tesla M2070-Q
The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics P530 scores 1,310 and the Tesla M2070-Q reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics P530 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics P530) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q). Raw compute: 0.4416 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P530) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q).
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,310 | 1,306 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 448+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4416 TFLOPS | 1.028 TFLOPS+133% |
| ROPs | 3 | 48+1500% |
| TMUs | 16 | 56+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics P530 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070-Q has 512 MB. The Tesla M2070-Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics P530 draws 15W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 175% difference. The HD Graphics P530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics P530) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 87.3+1405% | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics P530 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489 and now averages $50. The HD Graphics P530 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (HD Graphics P530) vs 26.1 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the HD Graphics P530 offers Infinity% better value. The HD Graphics P530 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $5489 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 26.1 |
| Codename | Skylake GT2 | GF100 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #859 | #798 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics P530 and Tesla M2070-Q
