
FirePro M40003
Popular choices:

HD Graphics P530
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro M40003
2012Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics P530: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics P530 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.
HD Graphics P530
2015Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015β2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
FirePro M40003
2012HD Graphics P530
2015Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics P530: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics P530 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015β2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro M40003 better than HD Graphics P530?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does HD Graphics P530 make more sense than FirePro M40003?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M40003 and HD Graphics P530

FirePro M40003
FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.

HD Graphics P530
HD Graphics P530
The HD Graphics P530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,310 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the HD Graphics P530 reaches 1,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the HD Graphics P530 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 192 (HD Graphics P530). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 0.4416 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P530).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,364+4% | 1,310 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+57% | 0.4416 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 32+100% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M40003 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics P530 has 0 MB. The FirePro M40003 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M40003) vs 12 (12_1) (HD Graphics P530). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003) vs Quick Sync 5 (HD Graphics P530). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs Quick Sync 5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,VP9 (HD Graphics P530).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | Quick Sync 5 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | Quick Sync 5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the HD Graphics P530's 15W β a 75% difference. The HD Graphics P530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 1W (HD Graphics P530). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 82mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 41.3 | 87.3+111% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M40003 launched at $150 MSRP, while the HD Graphics P530 launched at $0. The HD Graphics P530 costs 100+% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (FirePro M40003) vs Infinity (HD Graphics P530) β the HD Graphics P530 offers Infinity% better value. The HD Graphics P530 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Chelsea | Skylake GT2 |
| Release | June 27 2012 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #752 | #859 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













