
FirePro M40003

HD Graphics P530
FirePro M40003 vs HD Graphics P530 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M40003 vs HD Graphics P530 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M40003 vs HD Graphics P530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M40003
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅HD Graphics P530 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro M40003 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.
HD Graphics P530
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M40003 vs HD Graphics P530 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.

HD Graphics P530
The HD Graphics P530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,310 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the HD Graphics P530 reaches 1,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the HD Graphics P530 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 192 (HD Graphics P530). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 0.4416 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P530).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,364+4% | 1,310 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+57% | 0.4416 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 32+100% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M40003 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics P530 carries 0 MB. FirePro M40003 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M40003 and System on the HD Graphics P530.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M40003) vs 12 (12_1) (HD Graphics P530). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003) vs Quick Sync 5 (HD Graphics P530). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs Quick Sync 5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,VP9 (HD Graphics P530).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | Quick Sync 5 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | Quick Sync 5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the HD Graphics P530's 15W — a 75% difference. The HD Graphics P530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 1W (HD Graphics P530). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 41.3 | 87.3+111% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M40003 came in at $150, while the HD Graphics P530 launched at $0. On MSRP, HD Graphics P530 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (FirePro M40003) vs Infinity (HD Graphics P530) — the HD Graphics P530 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics P530 (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | HD Graphics P530 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Chelsea | Skylake GT2 |
| Release | June 27 2012 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #752 | #859 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















