Core i5-12400F
VS
Opteron 4386

Core i5-12400F vs Opteron 4386

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
VS
AMD

Opteron 4386

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-12400F

#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
121%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
118%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
116%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
115%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
113%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
113%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
109%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
106%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
106%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
105%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
104%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
103%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
102%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
102%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
100%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
100%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
99%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
98%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
98%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
98%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
95%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
93%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
92%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
91%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
91%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
91%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
91%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
90%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
90%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
90%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 4386

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
29148%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
5503%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4889%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3777%
#528
Xeon E5-2687W v3
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $749
95%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
90%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
88%
#945
Opteron 4386
MSRP: $459|Avg: $459
100%
#946
Xeon E5-2640
MSRP: $885|Avg: N/A
100%
#947
Xeon E5-2643 v4
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $555
100%
#949
Xeon E5-2630 v2
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1224
98%
#953
Xeon E5-1620
MSRP: $885|Avg: $70
93%
#955
Xeon E5462
MSRP: $342|Avg: $45
91%
#958
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
89%
#959
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-12400F (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-12400FOpteron 4386
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($110)
⚠️ Higher cost ($459)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Seoul (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 4386 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-12400FOpteron 4386
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2390%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($110)
⚠️ Higher cost ($459)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Opteron 4386

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Opteron 4386

The Opteron 4386 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,273 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Opteron 4386 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 4386 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 4386 — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Opteron 4386 uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Opteron 4386's 3,273 — a 142.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4386.

FeatureCore i5-12400FOpteron 4386
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+16%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz+24%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+125%
8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
8192 kB+540%
Process
Intel 7 nm-78%
32 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Seoul (2012)
PassMark
19,532+497%
3,273
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 4386 uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR3-1866 on the Opteron 4386 — the Core i5-12400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 42 (Opteron 4386) — the Opteron 4386 offers 22 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-12400FOpteron 4386
Socket
LGA1700
C32
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+67%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
42+110%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V (Opteron 4386). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Opteron 4386 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FOpteron 4386
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Opteron 4386 debuted at $459. At current prices ($110 vs $459), the Core i5-12400F is $349 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 177.6 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Opteron 4386 — making the Core i5-12400F the 184.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-12400FOpteron 4386
MSRP
$174-62%
$459
Avg Price (30d)
$110-76%
$459
Performance per Dollar
177.6+2401%
7.1
Release Date
2022
2012