Core i5-13400F vs Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core i5-13400F
Core 2 Solo SU3300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Solo SU3300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-13400F | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-13400F | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+458%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Core 2 Solo SU3300
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — a 117.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core 2 Solo SU3300's 1,247 — a 181% lead for the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+900% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+283% | 1.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB+140% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-84% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 25,029+1907% | 1,247 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — the Core i5-13400F supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 1 (Core 2 Solo SU3300). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 0 (Core 2 Solo SU3300) — the Core i5-13400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+355% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+150% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+4700% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x (Core 2 Solo SU3300). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core 2 Solo SU3300 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mobile |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 debuted at $262. At current prices ($180 vs $50), the Core 2 Solo SU3300 is $130 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 139.1 pts/$ vs 24.9 pts/$ for the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — making the Core i5-13400F the 139.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-25% | $262 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $180 | $50-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 139.1+459% | 24.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-13400F and Core 2 Solo SU3300
