
Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core 2 Solo SU3300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Solo SU3300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($486) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+414%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($486) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core 2 Solo SU3300

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

Core 2 Solo SU3300
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 15 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — a 130.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Core 2 Solo SU3300's 1,247 — a 192.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+1500% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+375% | 1.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB+200% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-89% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 62,323+4898% | 1,247 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,581 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,926 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,643 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 1 (Core 2 Solo SU3300). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 0 (Core 2 Solo SU3300) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+355% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+150% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs VT-x (Core 2 Solo SU3300). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Solo SU3300 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 debuted at $262. At current prices ($486 vs $50), the Core 2 Solo SU3300 is $436 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers 128.2 pts/$ vs 24.9 pts/$ for the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 134.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $262-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $486 | $50-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 128.2+415% | 24.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















