Core i5-13400F
VS
EPYC 4564P

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4564P

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 4564P

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F

#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
107%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
107%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
106%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
106%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
105%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
105%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
104%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
104%
#74
Ryzen 5 5500GT
MSRP: $125|Avg: $130
104%
#75
Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP: $140|Avg: $185
76%
#75
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP: $309|Avg: $140
104%
#76
Ryzen 7 7700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
103%
#77
Ryzen 9 5900XT
MSRP: $349|Avg: $311
102%
#78
Core i5-12500
MSRP: $212|Avg: $140
101%
#79
Core i5-14600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $275
101%
#80
Ryzen 7 7700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $246
101%
#81
Core i5-13400F
MSRP: $196|Avg: $180
100%
#82
Core i3-12100T
MSRP: $125|Avg: $90
100%
#83
Core i7-11700F
MSRP: $298|Avg: $150
100%
#84
Core i3-10105F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $65
99%
#85
Core i5-9400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
98%
#86
Core i7-12700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
98%
#87
Core i5-12490F
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#88
Ryzen 5 5600GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $150
97%
#89
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
97%
#90
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
97%
#91
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
96%
#92
Ryzen 5 8600G
MSRP: $229|Avg: $190
96%
#93
Core i7-13700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
94%
#94
Ryzen 7 9700X
MSRP: $359|Avg: $285
94%
#95
Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP: $429|Avg: $370
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4564P

#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
108%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
108%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
106%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
106%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
105%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
105%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
105%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
104%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
103%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
100%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
100%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
100%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
100%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
99%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
97%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
96%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
95%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
95%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
93%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
93%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($1,517) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 4564P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i5-13400FEPYC 4564P
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($180)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,517)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-13400F ($180), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($1,337 less, 88% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i5-13400FEPYC 4564P
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+228%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($180)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,517)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and EPYC 4564P

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

AMD

EPYC 4564P

The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4564P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 4564P has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P — a 21.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4564P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 4564P's 64,387 — a 88% lead for the EPYC 4564P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 38,500 (81.5% advantage for the EPYC 4564P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,975, a 21.1% lead for the EPYC 4564P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 18,581 (47.8% advantage for the EPYC 4564P). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P.

FeatureCore i5-13400FEPYC 4564P
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
16 / 32+60%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5.7 GHz+24%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
4.5 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+220%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark
25,029
64,387+157%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
38,500+137%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
2,975+24%
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
18,581+63%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4564P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (EPYC 4564P) — the EPYC 4564P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P).

FeatureCore i5-13400FEPYC 4564P
Socket
LGA1700
AM5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
28+40%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4564P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X.

FeatureCore i5-13400FEPYC 4564P
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use
Gaming
High-end Server / Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the EPYC 4564P debuted at $1517. At current prices ($180 vs $1517), the Core i5-13400F is $1337 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 139.1 pts/$ vs 42.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 4564P — making the Core i5-13400F the 106.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400FEPYC 4564P
MSRP
$196-87%
$1517
Avg Price (30d)
$180-88%
$1517
Performance per Dollar
139.1+228%
42.4
Release Date
2023
2024