Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Core i5-13400F
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($180) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,419) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+113%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($180) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,419) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X's 92,808 — a 115% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 41,000 (86.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 3,200, a 28.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 26,000 (78% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 24 / 48+140% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.3 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz+68% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+540% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 92,808+271% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | 41,000+153% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | 3,200+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | 26,000+128% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 1024 GB+433% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 88+340% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | Content Creation / Rendering |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X debuted at $1499. At current prices ($180 vs $1419), the Core i5-13400F is $1239 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 139.1 pts/$ vs 65.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X — making the Core i5-13400F the 72% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-87% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $180-87% | $1419 |
| Performance per Dollar | 139.1+113% | 65.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
