Core i7-13700K vs Celeron U3600
Core i7-13700K
Celeron U3600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700K
Performance Per Dollar Celeron U3600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-13700K | Celeron U3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) | ✅ More affordable ($134) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-13700K | Celeron U3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2354%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) | ✅ More affordable ($134) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Celeron U3600
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Celeron U3600
The Celeron U3600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 625 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Celeron U3600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 0.1 GHz on the Celeron U3600 — a 192.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Celeron U3600 uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Celeron U3600's 625 — a 194.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 2 MB on the Celeron U3600.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Celeron U3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+700% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+5300% | 0.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+183% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+1400% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-78% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Westmere (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 45,784+7225% | 625 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Celeron U3600 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Celeron U3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | BGA1288 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Celeron U3600). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Celeron U3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Celeron U3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Celeron U3600 debuted at $134. At current prices ($400 vs $134), the Celeron U3600 is $266 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 4.7 pts/$ for the Celeron U3600 — making the Core i7-13700K the 184.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Celeron U3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $134-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $134-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+2336% | 4.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-13700K and Celeron U3600
