CPU
GPU
Intel UHD Graphics 617
Popular choices:
GeForce 920A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 920A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 920A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 617.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 920A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and GeForce 920A
Intel UHD Graphics 617
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.
GeForce 920A
The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 scores 819 and the GeForce 920A reaches 829 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce 920A uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 384 (GeForce 920A). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 941 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 819 | 829+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4032 TFLOPS | 0.7227 TFLOPS+79% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+12% | 941 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 8+167% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 920A has 512 MB. The GeForce 920A offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 11.0 (GeForce 920A). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+9% | 11.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs No (GeForce 920A). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP5.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | No |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 draws 15W versus the GeForce 920A's 33W — a 75% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 350W (GeForce 920A). Power connectors: Integrated vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-55% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.6+118% | 25.1 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce 920A launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 55.3 (GeForce 920A) — the Intel UHD Graphics 617 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 55.3 |
| Codename | Amber Lake GT2 | GM108 |
| Release | November 7 2018 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #921 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 617 and GeForce 920A
