Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Radeon R7 A8-7500

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 617

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7500

2015Boost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Radeon R7 A8-7500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Radeon R7 A8-7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 617

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon R7 A8-7500

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 617 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 A8-7500 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 617 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (819 vs 811), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 A8-7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A8-7500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel UHD Graphics 617 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Radeon R7 A8-7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 617

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7500

The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 811 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 scores 819 and the Radeon R7 A8-7500 reaches 811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R7 A8-7500 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7500). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7500). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 A8-7500
G3D Mark Score
819
811
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
1024+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4032 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+395%
Boost Clock
1050 MHz+8%
975 MHz
ROPs
3
32+967%
TMUs
24
64+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 A8-7500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7500 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 A8-7500 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 617 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7500.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 A8-7500
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7500's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7500). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 A8-7500
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
54.6+574%
8.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 617 came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 A8-7500 launched at $100. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 617 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 8.1 (Radeon R7 A8-7500) — the Intel UHD Graphics 617 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 617 (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 A8-7500
MSRP
$0-100%
$100
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
8.1
Codename
Amber Lake GT2
Trinidad
Release
November 7 2018
June 18 2015
Ranking
#921
#467

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.