GRID M60-0Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 617

GRID M60-0Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 617

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
······

GRID M60-0Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 617 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-0Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 617: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-0Q

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 617 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID M60-0Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
  • 26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.

Intel UHD Graphics 617

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M60-0Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (827 vs 819), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M60-0Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M60-0Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID M60-0Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 617 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-0Q

The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 617

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-0Q scores 827 and the Intel UHD Graphics 617 reaches 819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0Q) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGRID M60-0QIntel UHD Graphics 617
G3D Mark Score
827
819
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Generation 9.5
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+967%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+1097%
0.4032 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+12%
1050 MHz
ROPs
64+2033%
3
TMUs
128+433%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M60-0QIntel UHD Graphics 617
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M60-0Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 carries 0 MB. GRID M60-0Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-0Q and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 617.

FeatureGRID M60-0QIntel UHD Graphics 617
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureGRID M60-0QIntel UHD Graphics 617
DirectX
12_1
12_1
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GRID M60-0Q) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs QuickSync.

FeatureGRID M60-0QIntel UHD Graphics 617
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
QuickSync
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd Gen
QuickSync
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-0Q draws 225W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 617's 15W — a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0Q) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGRID M60-0QIntel UHD Graphics 617
TDP
225W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
267mm
1mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Perf/Watt
3.7
54.6+1376%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-0Q came in at $0, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID M60-0Q) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 617) — the Intel UHD Graphics 617 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 617 (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M60-0QIntel UHD Graphics 617
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
GM204
Amber Lake GT2
Release
August 30 2015
November 7 2018
Ranking
#433
#921

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.