
GRID M60-0Q

Intel UHD Graphics 617
GRID M60-0Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 617 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M60-0Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 617 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M60-0Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 617: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M60-0Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics 617 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID M60-0Q is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
- ❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.
Intel UHD Graphics 617
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M60-0Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 617 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-0Q
The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.

Intel UHD Graphics 617
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-0Q scores 827 and the Intel UHD Graphics 617 reaches 819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0Q) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 827 | 819 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+1097% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+12% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+2033% | 3 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-0Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 carries 0 MB. GRID M60-0Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-0Q and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 617.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GRID M60-0Q) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs QuickSync.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | QuickSync |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-0Q draws 225W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 617's 15W — a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0Q) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7 | 54.6+1376% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M60-0Q came in at $0, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID M60-0Q) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 617) — the Intel UHD Graphics 617 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 617 (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | GM204 | Amber Lake GT2 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #433 | #921 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














