
GRID M60-0Q

Quadro FX 3800
GRID M60-0Q vs Quadro FX 3800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M60-0Q vs Quadro FX 3800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M60-0Q vs Quadro FX 3800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M60-0Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 225W vs 189W.
- ❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.
Quadro FX 3800
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 189W instead of 225W, a 36W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M60-0Q vs Quadro FX 3800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-0Q
The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-0Q scores 827 and the Quadro FX 3800 reaches 824 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro FX 3800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3800). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0Q) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800).
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 827 | 824 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+753% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+676% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-0Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3800 carries 1 GB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-0Q and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-0Q) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3800) — the GRID M60-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+20% | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GRID M60-0Q) vs PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs PureVideo HD.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | PureVideo HD |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-0Q draws 225W versus the Quadro FX 3800's 189W — a 17.4% difference. The Quadro FX 3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0Q) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 189W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7 | 4.4+19% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M60-0Q came in at $0, while the Quadro FX 3800 launched at $799. On MSRP, GRID M60-0Q was 100+% cheaper ($799 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID M60-0Q) vs 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) — the GRID M60-0Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-0Q (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 1.0 |
| Codename | GM204 | GT200B |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #433 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














