GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon HD 6650A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon HD 6650A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon HD 6650A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-0Q

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 225W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 6650A

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 225W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6650A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (836 vs 827), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M60-0Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6650A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6650A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M60-0Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon HD 6650A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-0Q

The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.

Radeon HD 6650A

The Radeon HD 6650A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 836 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-0Q scores 827 and the Radeon HD 6650A reaches 836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6650A uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6650A). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0Q) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6650A).

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon HD 6650A
G3D Mark Score	827	836+1%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+327%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+738%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+700%	8
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	768 KB+1500%	48 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon HD 6650A
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-0Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6650A. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-0Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6650A) — the GRID M60-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon HD 6650A
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6650A's 45W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6650A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6650A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon HD 6650A
TDP	225W	45W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	267mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	3.7	18.6+403%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-0Q came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 6650A launched at $100. On MSRP, GRID M60-0Q was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID M60-0Q) vs 8.4 (Radeon HD 6650A) — the GRID M60-0Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-0Q (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP	$0-100%	$100
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	8.4
Codename	GM204	Onega
Release	August 30 2015	April 19 2011
Ranking	#433	#926

Search GRID M60-0Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6650A on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.