
GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

GRID M60-0Q
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M60-0Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-0Q.
| Insight | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $86 versus $500 for the GRID M60-0Q, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 488.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+488.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($86) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-0Q and Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

GRID M60-0Q
The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-0Q scores 827 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0Q) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2495 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 827 | 837+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+1171% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2495 MHz+112% |
| ROPs | 64 | 192+200% |
| TMUs | 128 | 384+200% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 3 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-0Q) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 26.9% difference. The GRID M60-0Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-24% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+32% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-0Q launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119 and now averages $86. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 costs 82.8% less ($414 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.7 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 9.7 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers 470.6% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $119 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $86-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 9.7+471% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 31 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #433 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















