GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

GRID M60-0Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023Core: 1855 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-0Q

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 225W instead of 295W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022βˆ’2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • βœ…More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022βˆ’2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌31.1% higher power demand at 295W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (837 vs 827), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 96 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-0Q

The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-0Q scores 827 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0Q) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2495 MHz.

FeatureGRID M60-0QRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
G3D Mark Score
827
837+1%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2048
6144+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS+1171%
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
2495 MHz+112%
ROPs
64
192+200%
TMUs
128
384+200%
L1 Cache
0.75 MB
3 MB+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M60-0QRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-0Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-0Q) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) β€” the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M60-0QRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W β€” a 26.9% difference. The GRID M60-0Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID M60-0QRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
TDP
225W-24%
295W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
β€”
Slots
2
β€”
Perf/Watt
3.7+32%
2.8
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-0Q came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119. On MSRP, GRID M60-0Q was 100+% cheaper ($119 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID M60-0Q) vs 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) β€” the GRID M60-0Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M60-0QRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP
$0-100%
$119
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
7.0
Codename
GM204
Navi 31
Release
August 30 2015
April 13 2023
Ranking
#433
#26

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.