
Intel UHD Graphics 617
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel UHD Graphics 617
2018Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 250W, a 235W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016β2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5670
2010Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Intel UHD Graphics 617: it remains the more sensible modern option while Intel UHD Graphics 617 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β1566.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 15W.
Intel UHD Graphics 617
2018Radeon HD 5670
2010Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 250W, a 235W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016β2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Intel UHD Graphics 617: it remains the more sensible modern option while Intel UHD Graphics 617 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β1566.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Intel UHD Graphics 617 better than Radeon HD 5670?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 5670 make more sense than Intel UHD Graphics 617?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 9 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 9 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and Radeon HD 5670

Intel UHD Graphics 617
Intel UHD Graphics 617
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.

Radeon HD 5670
Radeon HD 5670
The Radeon HD 5670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 scores 819 and the Radeon HD 5670 reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 5670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 5670). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5670). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 819+2% | 800 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1536+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4032 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+570% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+19% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 24 | 96+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5670 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 5670 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 5670's 250W β a 177.4% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 250W (Radeon HD 5670). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-94% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 250W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | 1mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 54.6+1606% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 5670 launched at $99. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 costs 100+% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 8.1 (Radeon HD 5670) β the Intel UHD Graphics 617 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2010).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 8.1 |
| Codename | Amber Lake GT2 | Cayman |
| Release | November 7 2018 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #921 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













