Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 617

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 617

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 617 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (819 vs 806), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 14nm, and 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel UHD Graphics 617 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 617

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 scores 819 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 reaches 806 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
G3D Mark Score
819+2%
806
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Bristol Ridge
Process Node
14 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
192
4096+2033%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4032 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+11765%
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2920 MHz+178%
ROPs
3
128+4167%
TMUs
24
256+967%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 617 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
DirectX
12_1
12
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 6.0.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Encoder
QuickSync
VCE 3.0
Decoder
QuickSync
UVD 6.0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 181% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
TDP
15W-95%
300W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
1mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
54.6+1922%
2.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 617 came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 617 was 100+% cheaper ($169 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 617) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Intel UHD Graphics 617 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2018).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 617Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP
$0-100%
$169
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
4.8
Codename
Amber Lake GT2
Navi 48
Release
November 7 2018
July 23 2025
Ranking
#921
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.