Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs FirePro 3D V8700
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V8700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V8700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro 3D V8700
Intel UHD Graphics 630
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.
FirePro 3D V8700
The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 scores 1,231 and the FirePro 3D V8700 reaches 1,206 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the FirePro 3D V8700 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,231+2% | 1,206 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 184 | 2048+1013% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4232 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+723% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 23 | 128+457% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB. The FirePro 3D V8700 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the FirePro 3D V8700's 274W — a 179.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8700). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 254mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 82.1+1766% | 4.4 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro 3D V8700 launched at $1499 and now averages $1229. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 costs 100+% less ($1229 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 1.0 (FirePro 3D V8700) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $1229 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 1.0 |
| Codename | Comet Lake GT2 | Tahiti |
| Release | October 1 2017 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #824 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro 3D V8700
