Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2000 D

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

2011Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2000 D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2000 D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 62W, a 47W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quadro 2000 D

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 2000 D is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 313.3% higher power demand at 62W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 2000 D is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (1,239 vs 1,231), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 2000 D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 2000 D makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2000 D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 scores 1,231 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on 14 nm+++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630Quadro 2000 D
G3D Mark Score
1,231
1,239
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Fermi
Process Node
14 nm+++
40 nm
Shading Units
184
192+4%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4232 TFLOPS
0.48 TFLOPS+13%
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
23
32+39%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630Quadro 2000 D
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D carries 4 GB. Quadro 2000 D gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 D.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630Quadro 2000 D
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 122.1% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630Quadro 2000 D
TDP
15W-76%
62W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
178mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
82.1+310%
20.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 630 came in at $0, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 630 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 2.1 (Quadro 2000 D) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630Quadro 2000 D
MSRP
$0-100%
$599
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
2.1
Codename
Comet Lake GT2
GF106
Release
October 1 2017
October 5 2011
Ranking
#824
#892

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.