
Intel UHD Graphics 630

Quadro 2000 D
Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2000 D Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2000 D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2000 D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel UHD Graphics 630
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 62W, a 47W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quadro 2000 D
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 2000 D is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌313.3% higher power demand at 62W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2000 D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel UHD Graphics 630
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 scores 1,231 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on 14 nm+++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,231 | 1,239 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 184 | 192+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4232 TFLOPS | 0.48 TFLOPS+13% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 23 | 32+39% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D carries 4 GB. Quadro 2000 D gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 D.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 122.1% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-76% | 62W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 178mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 82.1+310% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 630 came in at $0, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 630 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 2.1 (Quadro 2000 D) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 2.1 |
| Codename | Comet Lake GT2 | GF106 |
| Release | October 1 2017 | October 5 2011 |
| Ranking | #824 | #892 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















