GeForce 930A vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

NVIDIA

GeForce 930A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 930A vs Intel UHD Graphics 630 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 930A vs Intel UHD Graphics 630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 930A

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 930A is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 930A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (1,241 vs 1,231), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 930A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 930A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 930A vs Intel UHD Graphics 630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 930A

The GeForce 930A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,241 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 930A scores 1,241 and the Intel UHD Graphics 630 reaches 1,231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930A is built on Maxwell while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930A) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 930A) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1150 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 930AIntel UHD Graphics 630
G3D Mark Score
1,241
1,231
Architecture
Maxwell
Generation 9.5
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
384+109%
184
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS+71%
0.4232 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
941 MHz
1150 MHz+22%
ROPs
8+167%
3
TMUs
24+4%
23

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 930A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 930AIntel UHD Graphics 630
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 930A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 carries 0 MB. GeForce 930A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 930A and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 630.

FeatureGeForce 930AIntel UHD Graphics 630
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 930A draws 33W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 630's 15W — a 75% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930A) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce 930AIntel UHD Graphics 630
TDP
33W
15W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
Legacy
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
37.6
82.1+118%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 930A came in at $150, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 630 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (GeForce 930A) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 930AIntel UHD Graphics 630
MSRP
$150
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
8.3
Infinity
Codename
GM108
Comet Lake GT2
Release
March 13 2015
October 1 2017
Ranking
#810
#824

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.