
GeForce 930A

GeForce GTX 280
GeForce 930A vs GeForce GTX 280 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 930A vs GeForce GTX 280 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 930A vs GeForce GTX 280: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 930A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 317.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 236W, a 203W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 280 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTX 280
2008Why buy it
- ✅17.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌332.7% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌615.2% higher power demand at 236W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 930A vs GeForce GTX 280 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 930A
The GeForce 930A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,241 points.

GeForce GTX 280
The GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,285 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 930A scores 1,241 and the GeForce GTX 280 reaches 1,285 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 280 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930A) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 280). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 930A) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 280).
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce GTX 280 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,241 | 1,285+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS+16% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce GTX 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 930A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 280 carries 1 GB. GeForce GTX 280 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 930A and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 280. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930A) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 280) — the GeForce 930A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce GTX 280 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 930A) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce GTX 280 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2 (GeForce 930A) vs None (GeForce GTX 280). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD (VP2). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 930A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280).
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce GTX 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD (VP2) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 930A draws 33W versus the GeForce GTX 280's 236W — a 150.9% difference. The GeForce 930A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930A) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 280). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce GTX 280 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-86% | 236W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 37.6+596% | 5.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 930A came in at $150, while the GeForce GTX 280 launched at $649. On MSRP, GeForce 930A was 76.9% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (GeForce 930A) vs 2.0 (GeForce GTX 280) — the GeForce 930A offers 315% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 930A (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 930A | GeForce GTX 280 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-77% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3+315% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | GT200 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | June 16 2008 |
| Ranking | #810 | #802 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















