GeForce 930A vs Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA

GeForce 930A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

2011Core: 475 MHz

GeForce 930A vs Quadro 4000M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 930A vs Quadro 4000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 930A vs Quadro 4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 930A

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 100W, a 67W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Why buy it

  • 50.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 203% higher power demand at 100W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (1,287 vs 1,241), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 930A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 930A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro 4000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 930A vs Quadro 4000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 930A

The GeForce 930A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,241 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 930A scores 1,241 and the Quadro 4000M reaches 1,287 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930A is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 4000M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930A) vs 336 (Quadro 4000M). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 930A) vs 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M).

FeatureGeForce 930AQuadro 4000M
G3D Mark Score
1,241
1,287+4%
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+14%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS+13%
0.6384 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
56+133%
L1 Cache
192 KB
448 KB+133%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 930A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 4000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 930AQuadro 4000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 930A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000M carries 2 GB. Quadro 4000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 930A and 64-bit on the Quadro 4000M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930A) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 4000M) — the GeForce 930A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 930AQuadro 4000M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 930A draws 33W versus the Quadro 4000M's 100W — a 100.8% difference. The GeForce 930A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930A) vs 350W (Quadro 4000M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 930AQuadro 4000M
TDP
33W-67%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
37.6+191%
12.9
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 930A (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 930AQuadro 4000M
MSRP
$150
Codename
GM108
GF104
Release
March 13 2015
February 22 2011
Ranking
#810
#801

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.