GeForce 930MX vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

NVIDIA

GeForce 930MX

2016Core: 952 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 930MX vs Intel UHD Graphics 630 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 930MX vs Intel UHD Graphics 630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 930MX

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 930MX is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 930MX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.8% in PassMark G3D (1,278 vs 1,231), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 930MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 930MX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 930MX vs Intel UHD Graphics 630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 930MX

The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 930MX scores 1,278 and the Intel UHD Graphics 630 reaches 1,231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930MX is built on Maxwell while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930MX) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Raw compute: 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 1150 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 930MXIntel UHD Graphics 630
G3D Mark Score
1,278+4%
1,231
Architecture
Maxwell
Generation 9.5
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
384+109%
184
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7834 TFLOPS+85%
0.4232 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1020 MHz
1150 MHz+13%
ROPs
8+167%
3
TMUs
24+4%
23

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 930MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 930MXIntel UHD Graphics 630
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 930MX has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 carries 0 MB. GeForce 930MX gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 930MX and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 630.

FeatureGeForce 930MXIntel UHD Graphics 630
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 930MX draws 17W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 630's 15W — a 12.5% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930MX) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce 930MXIntel UHD Graphics 630
TDP
17W
15W-12%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
75.2
82.1+9%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 930MX came in at $80, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 630 was 100+% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.0 (GeForce 930MX) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce 930MXIntel UHD Graphics 630
MSRP
$80
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
16.0
Infinity
Codename
GM108
Comet Lake GT2
Release
March 1 2016
October 1 2017
Ranking
#805
#824

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.