FirePro 3D V8750 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

CPU

GPU

FirePro 3D V8750

2014Core: 850 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro 3D V8750

2 GB 274

1,272

+3.3%

Intel UHD Graphics 630

Shared System RAM 15

1,231

0.0%

Arc Graphics 130T

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro 3D V8750

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Intel UHD Graphics 630: it remains the more sensible modern option while Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌1726.7% higher power demand at 274W vs 15W.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 274W, a 259W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).

FirePro 3D V8750

2014

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Intel UHD Graphics 630: it remains the more sensible modern option while Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 274W, a 259W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌1726.7% higher power demand at 274W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro 3D V8750 better than Intel UHD Graphics 630?

Yes. FirePro 3D V8750 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 1,272 vs 1,231 in G3D Mark. On top of that, FirePro 3D V8750 is a 2014 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Intel UHD Graphics 630 is a 2017 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 3D V8750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 2 GB instead of Unknown. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

FirePro 3D V8750 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $1,799 MSRP. FirePro 3D V8750 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. FirePro 3D V8750 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $1,799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 3.3% higher G3D Mark. Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the newer 2017 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (15W vs 274W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Intel UHD Graphics 630 make more sense than FirePro 3D V8750?

Yes. Intel UHD Graphics 630 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 274W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro 3D V8750. The trade-off is that FirePro 3D V8750 currently gives you 3.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro 3D V8750 Benchmark Check

Intel UHD Graphics 630 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro 3D V8750	Intel UHD Graphics 630
1080p
low	57 FPS	15 FPS
medium	46 FPS	11 FPS
high	38 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	4 FPS
1440p
low	43 FPS	10 FPS
medium	34 FPS	6 FPS
high	29 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	4 FPS
medium	23 FPS	2 FPS
high	17 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	1 FPS

Open FirePro 3D V8750 Open Intel UHD Graphics 630

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro 3D V8750	Intel UHD Graphics 630
1080p
low	57 FPS	55 FPS
medium	46 FPS	44 FPS
high	38 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	43 FPS	42 FPS
medium	34 FPS	26 FPS
high	29 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	23 FPS
medium	23 FPS	14 FPS
high	19 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	8 FPS

Open FirePro 3D V8750 Open Intel UHD Graphics 630

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro 3D V8750	Intel UHD Graphics 630
1080p
low	57 FPS	55 FPS
medium	46 FPS	44 FPS
high	38 FPS	37 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	28 FPS
1440p
low	43 FPS	42 FPS
medium	34 FPS	33 FPS
high	29 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	28 FPS
medium	23 FPS	22 FPS
high	19 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	14 FPS

Open FirePro 3D V8750 Open Intel UHD Graphics 630

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro 3D V8750	Intel UHD Graphics 630
1080p
low	57 FPS	55 FPS
medium	46 FPS	44 FPS
high	38 FPS	27 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	19 FPS
1440p
low	43 FPS	9 FPS
medium	34 FPS	7 FPS
high	29 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	6 FPS
medium	23 FPS	4 FPS
high	19 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	2 FPS

Open FirePro 3D V8750 Open Intel UHD Graphics 630

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V8750 and Intel UHD Graphics 630

FirePro 3D V8750

The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8750 scores 1,272 and the Intel UHD Graphics 630 reaches 1,231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630).

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Intel UHD Graphics 630
G3D Mark Score	1,272+3%	1,231
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 9.5
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm+++
Shading Units	2048+1013%	184
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.482 TFLOPS+723%	0.4232 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+967%	3
TMUs	128+457%	23

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Intel UHD Graphics 630
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8750 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 has 0 MB. The FirePro 3D V8750 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Intel UHD Graphics 630
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8750 draws 274W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 630's 15W — a 179.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Intel UHD Graphics 630
TDP	274W	15W-95%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	254mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.6	82.1+1685%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro 3D V8750 launched at $1799 MSRP, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 costs 100+% less ($1799 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).