Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs GeForce GTX 760A
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 760A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 760A offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and GeForce GTX 760A
Intel UHD Graphics 630
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.
GeForce GTX 760A
The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 scores 1,231 and the GeForce GTX 760A reaches 1,226 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce GTX 760A uses Kepler, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760A). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 657 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,231 | 1,226 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 184 | 768+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4232 TFLOPS | 1.009 TFLOPS+138% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+75% | 657 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 23 | 64+178% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 760A offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 760A's 55W — a 114.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760A). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-73% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 82.1+268% | 22.3 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 760A launched at $249 and now averages $40. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 30.6 (GeForce GTX 760A) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 30.6 |
| Codename | Comet Lake GT2 | GK106 |
| Release | October 1 2017 | March 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #824 | #813 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 630 and GeForce GTX 760A
