CPU
GPU
Intel UHD Graphics
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 650.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics and Iris Plus Graphics 650
Intel UHD Graphics
The Intel UHD Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 10 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,511 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics scores 1,511 and the Iris Plus Graphics 650 reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses Generation 9.5, both on 10 nm+ vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Boost clocks: 750 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,511 | 1,500 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 10 nm+ | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 0.8832 TFLOPS+130% |
| Boost Clock | 750 MHz | 1150 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 8+33% | 6 |
| TMUs | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics draws 10W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 15W — a 40% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-33% | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 151.1+51% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0 and now averages $15. The Intel UHD Graphics costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 100.0 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) — the Intel UHD Graphics offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 100.0 |
| Codename | Jasper Lake GT1 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | January 11 2021 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #666 | #718 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics and Iris Plus Graphics 650
