
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Intel UHD Graphics

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:

Intel UHD Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The Intel UHD Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics.
| Insight | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Intel UHD Graphics

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

Intel UHD Graphics
The Intel UHD Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 10 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,511 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Intel UHD Graphics reaches 1,511 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm+. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,538+2% | 1,511 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS+120% | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz+47% | 750 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 8+33% |
| TMUs | 48+200% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Intel UHD Graphics's 10W — a 40% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 10W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 102.5 | 151.1+47% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Intel UHD Graphics launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics) — the Intel UHD Graphics offers NaN% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | Jasper Lake GT1 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | January 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #763 | #666 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















