FirePro V8700 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V8700 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V8700 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V8700

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro V8700 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro V8700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,539 vs 1,538), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V8700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro V8700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro V8700 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V8700

The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V8700 scores 1,539 and the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 reaches 1,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses Generation 8.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V8700) vs 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V8700) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200).

Feature	FirePro V8700	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
G3D Mark Score	1,539	1,538
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Generation 8.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1280+233%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.856 TFLOPS+120%	0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+433%	6
TMUs	80+67%	48

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V8700	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V8700 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 carries 0 MB. FirePro V8700 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8700 and System on the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

Feature	FirePro V8700	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V8700 draws 150W versus the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8700) vs 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	FirePro V8700	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
TDP	150W	15W-90%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	254mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	60	—
Perf/Watt	10.3	102.5+895%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V8700 came in at $1499, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro V8700) vs Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 (2014 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro V8700	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
MSRP	$1499	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.0	Infinity
Codename	Cayman	Broadwell GT3e
Release	May 24 2011	September 5 2014
Ranking	#656	#763

Search FirePro V8700 on Amazon

Search Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.