
FirePro V8700

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
FirePro V8700 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V8700 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V8700 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V8700
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌399.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
- ❌25300% longer card at 254mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 411.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 254mm, a 253mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V8700 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V8700
The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V8700 scores 1,539 and the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V8700) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V8700) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,539 | 1,575+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+57% | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8700 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275X / M375. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V8700) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the FirePro V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro V8700) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12_0+19% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V8700) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V8700 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M275X / M375's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8700) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 254mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 254mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3 | 21.0+104% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V8700 came in at $1499, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M275X / M375 was 80% cheaper ($1199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro V8700) vs 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers 430% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M275X / M375 (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $300-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 5.3+430% |
| Codename | Cayman | Venus |
| Release | May 24 2011 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #656 | #746 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















