
FirePro V8700

RTXA5000-6Q
FirePro V8700 vs RTXA5000-6Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V8700 vs RTXA5000-6Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V8700 vs RTXA5000-6Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V8700
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 230W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RTXA5000-6Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅FirePro V8700 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RTXA5000-6Q is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V8700 vs RTXA5000-6Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V8700
The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.

RTXA5000-6Q
The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V8700 scores 1,539 and the RTXA5000-6Q reaches 1,522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the RTXA5000-6Q uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V8700) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V8700) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-6Q).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,539+1% | 1,522 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 8192+540% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+1396% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 8 MB+2481% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTXA5000-6Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V8700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V8700 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-6Q carries 512 MB. FirePro V8700 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8700 and 64-bit on the RTXA5000-6Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V8700) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-6Q) — the RTXA5000-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V8700 draws 150W versus the RTXA5000-6Q's 230W — a 42.1% difference. The FirePro V8700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8700) vs 350W (RTXA5000-6Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-35% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3+56% | 6.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V8700 came in at $1499, while the RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro V8700 was 40% cheaper ($1001 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro V8700) vs 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) — the FirePro V8700 offers 66.7% better value. The newer card here is RTXA5000-6Q (2021 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-40% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0+67% | 0.6 |
| Codename | Cayman | GA102 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #656 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















