
FirePro V8700 vs Radeon HD 6790

FirePro V8700
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6790
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V8700 is positioned at rank #347 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V8700
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6790 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V8700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro V8700 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6790 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6790 holds the technical lead. Priced at $149 (vs $170), it costs 12% less, resulting in a 16.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V8700 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+16.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) | ✅More affordable ($149) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V8700 and Radeon HD 6790

FirePro V8700
The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.

Radeon HD 6790
The Radeon HD 6790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 840 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,567 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V8700 scores 1,539 and the Radeon HD 6790 reaches 1,567 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 6790 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V8700) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6790). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V8700) vs 1.344 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6790).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,539 | 1,567+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+60% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+38% | 1.344 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V8700 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6790 has 1 GB. The FirePro V8700 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro V8700) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6790). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2 (11_0)+11% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V8700) vs None (Radeon HD 6790). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V8700) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6790).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V8700 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6790's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 6790 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8700) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6790). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 254mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60-25% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3 | 10.4 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V8700 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $170, while the Radeon HD 6790 launched at $149 and now averages $149. The Radeon HD 6790 costs 12.4% less ($21 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (FirePro V8700) vs 10.5 (Radeon HD 6790) — the Radeon HD 6790 offers 15.4% better value.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $149-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $149-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 10.5+15% |
| Codename | Cayman | Barts |
| Release | May 24 2011 | April 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #656 | #759 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













