
FirePro V8700 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

FirePro V8700
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V8700 is positioned at rank #347 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V8700
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V8700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $170), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 588.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+588.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V8700 and GeForce GTX 550 Ti

FirePro V8700
The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V8700 scores 1,539 and the GeForce GTX 550 Ti reaches 1,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V8700) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V8700) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 550 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,539 | 1,558+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+567% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+169% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V8700 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti has 3 GB. The FirePro V8700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V8700) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) — the FirePro V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V8700) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V8700 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 550 Ti's 116W — a 25.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8700) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 550 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 116W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3 | 13.4+30% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V8700 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $170, while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti launched at $149 and now averages $25. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti costs 85.3% less ($145 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (FirePro V8700) vs 62.3 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 584.6% better value.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $149-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $25-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 62.3+585% |
| Codename | Cayman | GF116 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #656 | #761 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













