
FirePro V8700

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
FirePro V8700 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V8700 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V8700 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V8700
2011Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌906% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌29.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 116W.
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 918.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 116W instead of 150W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V8700 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V8700
The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V8700 scores 1,539 and the GeForce GTX 550 Ti reaches 1,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V8700) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V8700) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 550 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,539 | 1,558+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+567% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+169% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V8700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V8700 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti carries 3 GB. FirePro V8700 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8700 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 550 Ti. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V8700) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) — the FirePro V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V8700) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V8700 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 550 Ti's 116W — a 25.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8700) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 550 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 116W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3 | 13.4+30% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V8700 came in at $1499, while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 550 Ti was 90.1% cheaper ($1350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro V8700) vs 10.5 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 950% better value.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $149-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 10.5+950% |
| Codename | Cayman | GF116 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #656 | #761 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















