Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M370X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M370X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M370X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M370X

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 M370X is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M370X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (1,570 vs 1,538), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 M370X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M370X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M370X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

Radeon R9 M370X

The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Radeon R9 M370X reaches 1,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon R9 M370X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M370X).

Feature	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon R9 M370X
G3D Mark Score	1,538	1,570+2%
Architecture	Generation 8.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon R9 M370X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M370X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M370X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M370X.

Feature	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon R9 M370X
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M370X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M370X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

Feature	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon R9 M370X
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	102.5+390%	20.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300. On MSRP, Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 5.2 (Radeon R9 M370X) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M370X (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP	$0-100%	$300
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	5.2
Codename	Broadwell GT3e	Cape Verde
Release	September 5 2014	May 19 2015
Ranking	#763	#758

Search Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M370X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.