
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

RTXA5000-6Q
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs RTXA5000-6Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs RTXA5000-6Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs RTXA5000-6Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 230W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
RTXA5000-6Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RTXA5000-6Q is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌1433.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs RTXA5000-6Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

RTXA5000-6Q
The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the RTXA5000-6Q reaches 1,522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the RTXA5000-6Q uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-6Q). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,538+1% | 1,522 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 8192+2033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+3187% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1695 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 6 | 96+1500% |
| TMUs | 48 | 256+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTXA5000-6Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-6Q carries 512 MB. RTXA5000-6Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and 64-bit on the RTXA5000-6Q.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the RTXA5000-6Q's 230W — a 175.5% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 350W (RTXA5000-6Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 102.5+1453% | 6.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 came in at $0, while the RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 was 100+% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RTXA5000-6Q (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.6 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | GA102 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #763 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















