Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs RTXA5000-6Q
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:
RTXA5000-6Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-6Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTXA5000-6Q is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The RTXA5000-6Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTXA5000-6Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and RTXA5000-6Q
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.
RTXA5000-6Q
The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the RTXA5000-6Q reaches 1,522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the RTXA5000-6Q uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-6Q). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,538+1% | 1,522 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 8192+2033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+3187% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1695 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 6 | 96+1500% |
| TMUs | 48 | 256+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-6Q has 512 MB. The RTXA5000-6Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the RTXA5000-6Q's 230W — a 175.5% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 350W (RTXA5000-6Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 102.5+1453% | 6.6 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500 and now averages $2500. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($2500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The RTXA5000-6Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.6 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | GA102 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #763 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and RTXA5000-6Q
