Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 4890

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4890

2009Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 4890 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 4890: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 190W, a 175W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4890

2009

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 4890 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1166.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4890 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,546 vs 1,538), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 4890 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4890 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 4890 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 4890

The Radeon HD 4890 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Radeon HD 4890 reaches 1,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon HD 4890 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4890). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4890).

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon HD 4890
G3D Mark Score
1,538
1,546
Architecture
Generation 8.0
TeraScale
Process Node
14 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS
1.36 TFLOPS+61%
ROPs
6
16+167%
TMUs
48+20%
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon HD 4890
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4890 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 4890 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4890.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon HD 4890
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 4890's 190W — a 170.7% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4890). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon HD 4890
TDP
15W-92%
190W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
500W
Power Connector
Integrated
2x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
102.5+1165%
8.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 4890 launched at $249. On MSRP, Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 6.2 (Radeon HD 4890) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 (2014 vs 2009).

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon HD 4890
MSRP
$0-100%
$249
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
6.2
Codename
Broadwell GT3e
RV790
Release
September 5 2014
April 2 2009
Ranking
#763
#762

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.