Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 730

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Intel UHD Graphics 730

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 730

2023Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1550 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Intel UHD Graphics 730 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Intel UHD Graphics 730 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 730.

InsightIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Intel UHD Graphics 730
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Intel UHD Graphics 730

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 730

The Intel UHD Graphics 730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Generation 12.2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,537 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Intel UHD Graphics 730 reaches 1,537 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 730 uses Generation 12.2, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 730). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 0.5952 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 730). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1550 MHz.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Intel UHD Graphics 730
G3D Mark Score
1,538
1,537
Architecture
Generation 8.0
Generation 12.2
Process Node
14 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS+42%
0.5952 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1550 MHz+41%
ROPs
6
6
TMUs
48+300%
12

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Intel UHD Graphics 730
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Intel UHD Graphics 730
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 730's 15W — a 0% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 730 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 730). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Intel UHD Graphics 730
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Perf/Watt
102.5
102.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Intel UHD Graphics 730 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 730) — the Intel UHD Graphics 730 offers NaN% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 730 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Intel UHD Graphics 730
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Broadwell GT3e
Raptor Lake GT1
Release
September 5 2014
January 3 2023
Ranking
#763
#749