Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • βœ…Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (1,575 vs 1,538), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M275X / M375 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon R9 M275X / M375
G3D Mark Score
1,538
1,575+2%
Architecture
Generation 8.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS
1.184 TFLOPS+40%
Boost Clock
1100 MHz+19%
925 MHz
ROPs
6
16+167%
TMUs
48+20%
40
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M275X / M375 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275X / M375.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon R9 M275X / M375
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M275X / M375's 75W β€” a 133.3% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon R9 M275X / M375
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
Mobile
Length
β€”
1mm
Slots
β€”
0
Perf/Watt
102.5+388%
21.0
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300. On MSRP, Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) β€” the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP
$0-100%
$300
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
5.3
Codename
Broadwell GT3e
Venus
Release
September 5 2014
January 28 2014
Ranking
#763
#746

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.