Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon 630

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon 630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon 630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon 630

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 630 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (1,575 vs 1,538), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 630 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 630 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon 630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

Radeon 630

The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Radeon 630 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon 630 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 512 (Radeon 630). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon 630
G3D Mark Score	1,538	1,575+2%
Architecture	Generation 8.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8448 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+48%
Boost Clock	1100 MHz	1218 MHz+11%
ROPs	6	16+167%
TMUs	48+50%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon 630
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 630 carries 512 MB. Radeon 630 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and 128-bit on the Radeon 630.

Feature	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon 630
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Radeon 630's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 350W (Radeon 630). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon 630
TDP	15W-70%	50W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	102.5+225%	31.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 came in at $0, while the Radeon 630 launched at $100. On MSRP, Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 15.8 (Radeon 630) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 630 (2019 vs 2014).

Feature	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon 630
MSRP	$0-100%	$100
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	15.8
Codename	Broadwell GT3e	Polaris 23
Release	September 5 2014	May 13 2019
Ranking	#763	#757

Search Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on Amazon

Search Radeon 630 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.