Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon 630
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:
Radeon 630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 630 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
| Insight | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon 630
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.
Radeon 630
The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Radeon 630 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon 630 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 512 (Radeon 630). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,538 | 1,575+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1218 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 630 has 512 MB. The Radeon 630 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Radeon 630's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 350W (Radeon 630). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 102.5+225% | 31.5 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon 630 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 31.5 (Radeon 630) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon 630 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 31.5 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | Polaris 23 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #763 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon 630
