
GeForce 940MX vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

GeForce 940MX
Popular choices:

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 940MX is positioned at rank #300 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 940MX
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 940MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 940MX | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 940MX and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

GeForce 940MX
The GeForce 940MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,509 points.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 940MX scores 1,509 and the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 reaches 1,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940MX is built on Maxwell while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce 940MX) vs 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Raw compute: 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 940MX) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Boost clocks: 861 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,509 | 1,538+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8817 TFLOPS+4% | 0.8448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 861 MHz | 1100 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 8+33% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 940MX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 0 MB. The GeForce 940MX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 940MX draws 23W versus the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200's 15W — a 42.1% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940MX) vs 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 23W | 15W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 65.6 | 102.5+56% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 940MX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.2 (GeForce 940MX) vs Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 940MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | June 28 2016 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #764 | #763 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















