GeForce 940MX
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 940MX vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 940MX vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 940MX vs Iris Plus Graphics 650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 940MX
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 650 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 940MX is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 23W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 23W, a 8W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 940MX vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 940MX
The GeForce 940MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,509 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 940MX scores 1,509 and the Iris Plus Graphics 650 reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940MX is built on Maxwell while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 512 (GeForce 940MX) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Raw compute: 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 940MX) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Boost clocks: 861 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,509 | 1,500 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8817 TFLOPS | 0.8832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 861 MHz | 1150 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 8+33% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 940MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 940MX has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 carries 0 MB. GeForce 940MX gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 940MX and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 650.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 940MX) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 940MX) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce 940MX) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 650).
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 940MX draws 23W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 15W — a 42.1% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940MX) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 23W | 15W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 65.6 | 100.0+52% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 940MX came in at $100, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 650 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.1 (GeForce 940MX) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 650) — the Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 650 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | June 28 2016 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #764 | #718 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 940MX and Iris Plus Graphics 650
