GeForce RTX 3070 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1378.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 650.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1378.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1378.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 10.9% better value per dollar than the Iris Plus Graphics 650.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 1,500 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 1378.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses Generation 9.5, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+1378% | 1,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 5888+1433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+2200% | 0.8832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+50% | 1150 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+1500% | 6 |
| TMUs | 184+283% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 650).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 15W — a 174.5% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0 and now averages $15. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 costs 92.5% less ($185 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 100.0 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 10.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $15-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+11% | 100.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #63 | #718 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and Iris Plus Graphics 650
