GeForce 940MX vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

NVIDIA

GeForce 940MX

2016Core: 795 MHzBoost: 861 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

2016Boost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 940MX vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 940MX vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 940MX vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 940MX

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 30.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 91.7% higher power demand at 23W vs 12W.

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

2016

Why buy it

  • 40.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 98.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.0 vs 15.1 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Draws 12W instead of 23W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 40.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 940MX instead at 1,509 vs 1,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 940MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 98.8% (30.0 vs 15.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 940MX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 940MX vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 940MX

The GeForce 940MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,509 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 1 2016. It features the GCN 1.2/2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 940MX scores 1,509 and the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940MX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) uses GCN 1.2/2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (GeForce 940MX) vs 384 (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)). Boost clocks: 861 MHz vs 800 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 940MXRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
G3D Mark Score
1,509
1,500
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.2/2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Boost Clock
861 MHz+8%
800 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 940MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 940MXRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 940MX and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge).

FeatureGeForce 940MXRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 940MX draws 23W versus the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)'s 12W — a 62.9% difference. The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940MX) vs 350W (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 940MXRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
TDP
23W
12W-48%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
65.6
125.0+91%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 940MX came in at $100, while the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) was 50% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.1 (GeForce 940MX) vs 30.0 (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)) — the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) offers 98.7% better value.

FeatureGeForce 940MXRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP
$100
$50-50%
Performance per Dollar
15.1
30.0+99%
Codename
GM107
Bristol Ridge
Release
June 28 2016
June 1 2016
Ranking
#764
#904

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.