GeForce 940MX vs GRID M10-1B

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 940MX vs GRID M10-1B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 940MX vs GRID M10-1B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 940MX

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2408.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.1 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 23W instead of 225W, a 202W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M10-1B

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2400% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 15.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌878.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 23W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 940MX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (1,509 vs 1,504), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 940MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 940MX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,400 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2408.3% (15.1 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 940MX vs GRID M10-1B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 940MX

The GeForce 940MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,509 points.

GRID M10-1B

The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 940MX scores 1,509 and the GRID M10-1B reaches 1,504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940MX is built on Maxwell while the GRID M10-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (GeForce 940MX) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1B). Raw compute: 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 940MX) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B). Boost clocks: 861 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 940MX	GRID M10-1B
G3D Mark Score	1,509	1,504
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	2048+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8817 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+447%
Boost Clock	861 MHz	1178 MHz+37%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 940MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M10-1B leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 940MX	GRID M10-1B
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 940MX and 64-bit on the GRID M10-1B. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 940MX) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1B) — the GRID M10-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 940MX	GRID M10-1B
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 940MX) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1B). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce 940MX	GRID M10-1B
DirectX	11.0	12_1+9%
Max Displays	1	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 940MX draws 23W versus the GRID M10-1B's 225W — a 162.9% difference. The GeForce 940MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940MX) vs 350W (GRID M10-1B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce 940MX	GRID M10-1B
TDP	23W-90%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	65.6+879%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 940MX came in at $100, while the GRID M10-1B launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce 940MX was 96% cheaper ($2400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.1 (GeForce 940MX) vs 0.6 (GRID M10-1B) — the GeForce 940MX offers 2416.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 940MX (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 940MX	GRID M10-1B
MSRP	$100-96%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	15.1+2417%	0.6
Codename	GM107	GM204
Release	June 28 2016	August 30 2015
Ranking	#764	#525

Search GeForce 940MX on Amazon

Search GRID M10-1B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.