
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Vega 10

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Vega 10
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 10 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Vega 10 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Vega 10.
| Insight | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon Vega 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Vega 10

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

Radeon Vega 10
The Radeon Vega 10 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 8 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1301 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,515 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Radeon Vega 10 reaches 1,515 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon Vega 10 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 640 (Radeon Vega 10). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1.665 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 10). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1301 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon Vega 10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,538+2% | 1,515 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 1.665 TFLOPS+97% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1301 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 6 | 8+33% |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon Vega 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon Vega 10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Radeon Vega 10's 10W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Vega 10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 10). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon Vega 10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 10W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 102.5 | 151.5+48% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon Vega 10 launched at $499 and now averages $100. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 15.2 (Radeon Vega 10) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 10 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon Vega 10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 15.2 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | Raven |
| Release | September 5 2014 | January 8 2019 |
| Ranking | #763 | #747 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















