Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Vega 10

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Vega 10

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1301 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Vega 10 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Vega 10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 15W vs 10W.

Radeon Vega 10

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Vega 10 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (1,538 vs 1,515), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Vega 10 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Vega 10 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Vega 10 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

AMD

Radeon Vega 10

The Radeon Vega 10 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 8 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1301 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,515 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Radeon Vega 10 reaches 1,515 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon Vega 10 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 640 (Radeon Vega 10). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1.665 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 10). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1301 MHz.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon Vega 10
G3D Mark Score
1,538+2%
1,515
Architecture
Generation 8.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS
1.665 TFLOPS+97%
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1301 MHz+18%
ROPs
6
8+33%
TMUs
48+20%
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon Vega 10
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and System on the Radeon Vega 10.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon Vega 10
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Radeon Vega 10's 10W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Vega 10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 10). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon Vega 10
TDP
15W
10W-33%
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Perf/Watt
102.5
151.5+48%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 came in at $0, while the Radeon Vega 10 launched at $499. On MSRP, Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 was 100+% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 3.0 (Radeon Vega 10) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 10 (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon Vega 10
MSRP
$0-100%
$499
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
3.0
Codename
Broadwell GT3e
Raven
Release
September 5 2014
January 8 2019
Ranking
#763
#747

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.