
GRID M10-1B vs Intel UHD Graphics

GRID M10-1B
Popular choices:

Intel UHD Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-1B is positioned at rank #377 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-1B
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The Intel UHD Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-1B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M10-1B offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID M10-1B | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-1B and Intel UHD Graphics

GRID M10-1B
The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.

Intel UHD Graphics
The Intel UHD Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 10 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,511 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-1B scores 1,504 and the Intel UHD Graphics reaches 1,511 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm+. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1B) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B) vs 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 750 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,504 | 1,511 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 2048+700% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+1157% | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+57% | 750 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-1B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics has 0 MB. The GRID M10-1B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-1B draws 225W versus the Intel UHD Graphics's 10W — a 183% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1B) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 10W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 151.1+2155% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-1B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Intel UHD Graphics launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.0 (GRID M10-1B) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics) — the Intel UHD Graphics offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM204 | Jasper Lake GT1 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #525 | #666 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















