GRID M10-1B vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
GRID M10-1B
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-1B is positioned at rank #377 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-1B
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M10-1B is significantly newer (2015 vs 0). The GRID M10-1B likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-1B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake).
| Insight | GRID M10-1B | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Legacy (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID M10-1B remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-1B and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
GRID M10-1B
The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. The core clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-1B scores 1,504 and the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1B) vs 32 (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)).
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,504 | 1,500 |
| Shading Units | 2048+6300% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-1B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) has 0 MB. The GRID M10-1B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-1B draws 225W versus the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)'s 15W — a 175% difference. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1B) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 100.0+1393% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-1B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.0 (GRID M10-1B) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) — the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM204 | — |
| Release | August 30 2015 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #525 | #776 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-1B and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
