
FirePro V8700

GRID M10-1B
FirePro V8700 vs GRID M10-1B Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V8700 vs GRID M10-1B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V8700 vs GRID M10-1B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V8700
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌25300% longer card at 254mm vs 1mm.
GRID M10-1B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 254mm, a 253mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V8700 vs GRID M10-1B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V8700
The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.

GRID M10-1B
The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V8700 scores 1,539 and the GRID M10-1B reaches 1,504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GRID M10-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V8700) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1B). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V8700) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,539+2% | 1,504 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+160% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V8700 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-1B carries 512 MB. FirePro V8700 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8700 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-1B. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V8700) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1B) — the GRID M10-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro V8700) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1B). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12_1+19% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V8700 draws 150W versus the GRID M10-1B's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro V8700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8700) vs 350W (GRID M10-1B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3+54% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V8700 came in at $1499, while the GRID M10-1B launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro V8700 was 40% cheaper ($1001 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro V8700) vs 0.6 (GRID M10-1B) — the FirePro V8700 offers 66.7% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-1B (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-40% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0+67% | 0.6 |
| Codename | Cayman | GM204 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #656 | #525 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















