GRID M10-1B vs RTXA5000-6Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-1B vs RTXA5000-6Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-1B vs RTXA5000-6Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-1B

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RTXA5000-6Q

2021

Why buy it

✅GRID M10-1B is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RTXA5000-6Q is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTXA5000-6Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (1,522 vs 1,504), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTXA5000-6Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTXA5000-6Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $2,500 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.2% (0.6 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID M10-1B vs RTXA5000-6Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-1B

The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.

RTXA5000-6Q

The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-1B scores 1,504 and the RTXA5000-6Q reaches 1,522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTXA5000-6Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1B) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-6Q). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1695 MHz.

Feature	GRID M10-1B	RTXA5000-6Q
G3D Mark Score	1,504	1,522+1%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2048	8192+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS+476%
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1695 MHz+44%
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	128	256+100%
L1 Cache	0.75 MB	8 MB+967%
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTXA5000-6Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M10-1B leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GRID M10-1B	RTXA5000-6Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-1B and 64-bit on the RTXA5000-6Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-1B) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-6Q) — the RTXA5000-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-1B	RTXA5000-6Q
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-1B draws 225W versus the RTXA5000-6Q's 230W — a 2.2% difference. The GRID M10-1B is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1B) vs 350W (RTXA5000-6Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M10-1B	RTXA5000-6Q
TDP	225W-2%	230W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	6.7+2%	6.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-1B came in at $2500, while the RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (GRID M10-1B) vs 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) — the RTXA5000-6Q offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RTXA5000-6Q (2021 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID M10-1B	RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP	$2500	$2500
Performance per Dollar	0.6	0.6
Codename	GM204	GA102
Release	August 30 2015	April 12 2021
Ranking	#525	#53

Search GRID M10-1B on Amazon

Search RTXA5000-6Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.