
GRID M10-1B

Iris Plus Graphics 650
GRID M10-1B vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M10-1B vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M10-1B vs Iris Plus Graphics 650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M10-1B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 650 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID M10-1B is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-1B vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-1B
The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-1B scores 1,504 and the Iris Plus Graphics 650 reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1B) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,504 | 1,500 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+446% | 0.8832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+2% | 1150 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+967% | 6 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-1B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 carries 0 MB. GRID M10-1B gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-1B and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 650.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-1B) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-1B draws 225W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 15W — a 175% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1B) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 100.0+1393% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M10-1B came in at $2500, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 650 was 100+% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (GRID M10-1B) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 650) — the Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 650 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM204 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #525 | #718 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















